Conference Content

Learn more about who, what, when, and where.
2 of 4
Next

In & Out of the Hub

This is your portal to access more content in the Virtual Hub.
1 of 4
Next

Live Content

On these streams you will find live content happening during the conference.
4 of 4
Close

Connect with others

These spaces are built specifically for you to connect with others at the conference.
3 of 4
Next
← Back to Agenda
Tutorial
March
4
14:00
-
15:30
UTC
Join Meeting
Add to Calendar 03/04/2021 02:00 PM 03/04/2021 03:30 PM UTC Sociocultural Diversity in Machine Learning: Lessons from Philosophy, Psychology and Organizational Check out this session on the FAccT Hub. https://2021/facctconference.org/conference-agenda/sociocultural-diversity-in-machine-learning-lessons-from-philosophy-psychology-and-organizational
Philosophy / Law Track

Sociocultural Diversity in Machine Learning: Lessons from Philosophy, Psychology and Organizational

Sina Fazelpour, Maria De-Arteaga
Join the Conversation
Checkout Our Tutorial Page

Abstract

Sociocultural diversity is a key value in democratic societies both for reasons of equity and political legitimacy and because of its ramifications for group performance. As a result, researchers in philosophy, psychology, and social and organizational sciences have worked to understand diversity’s varied meanings, develop appropriate measures for quantifying diversity (in some specific sense), and specifying pathways by which diversity can be functionally beneficial to groups such as deliberative mini-publics, design teams, and scientific communities. Recently, there has also been a surge of interest in sociocultural diversity in machine learning (ML) research, with researchers proposing (i) diversity as a design desideratum in the construction pipeline of sociotechnical ML systems and (ii) team diversity as an organizational ideal for the composition of ML research and development teams. With respect to (i), researchers have proposed various measures of diversity, developed methods for satisfying these measures via modifications in data processing and learning, and examined the interaction between diversity, accuracy, and fairness. With respect to (ii), there have been claims about the benefits of team diversity in countering biases in ML systems, with more recent efforts aiming to empirically test these purported benefits. Currently, however, there is a gap between discussions of measures and benefits of diversity in ML, on the one hand, and the philosophical, psychological and organizational research on the underlying concepts of diversity and the precise mechanisms of its functional benefits, on the other. This gap is problematic because different concepts of diversity are based on distinct sets of cognitive, ethical, and political rationales that should inform how we measure diversity in a given context and why. Similarly, lack of specificity about the precise mechanisms underpinning diversity’s potential benefits can result in espousing uninformative or easily falsifiable generalities, invalid experimental designs, and illicit inferences from experimental results. This tutorial will bridge this gap from both angles—concepts and consequences. The first part will focus on discussions of concepts and consequences of sociocultural diversity, in philosophy, psychology, and social and organizational sciences. The second part will situate this understanding in and draw its implications for the discussions of sociocultural diversity in ML.

Recorded Live Session

This live session has not been uploaded yet. Check back soon or check out the live session.